Quality check

Insert here the references and the considerations for the quality check ... then create the remaining properties for the form "Quality check". "Expand" the English version as in the Italian * literary quality: is the article distinguished by a good, poor, average, remarkable, excellent, great, qualified, extraordinary literary quality ? Please point out the most appropriate adjective and evaluate it independently by the journalistic genre * Bias: is the author of the article part of any movement/organization/institution etc. that might have influenced his view of what he expresses in the article? Is there any bias due to funding received, pre-established ideals, or "company visions" ? Assess the writer's independence. + (Relevance: Is the research method/study design appropriate for answering the research question?​ Are specific inclusion / exclusion criteria used? ​ Reliability: ​Is the effect size practically relevant? How precise is the estimate of the effect? Were confidence intervals given? ​ Validity: ​Were there enough subjects in the study to establish that the findings did not occur by chance? ​ Were subjects randomly allocated? Were the groups comparable? If not, could this have introduced bias? ​ Are the measurements/ tools validated by other studies? ​ Could there be confounding factors? ​) * vocabulary used and style. In your opinion the article is: -- * misleading * contains a violent terminology ... ... low-educated adults --- please chose one or more of the following labels: ... * validity or substantiation of the arguments: does the article cite sources and are all the statements in the article intrinsically founded and properly justified ? Not all can be verified ! However the reasoning must be correct and all claims shall be true in the specific way in which they are expressed ! * critical thinking: do the article encourage reflection and to find out more on the argument ? * emotional impact: what and how do you feel after reading ? (multiple choice: upset, outraged, annoyed, I feel a grudge, I feel intimidated, interest, approval, exalted, not disturbed, nothing special ) please be sincere and report the dominant feeling, also if just addressed to the facts reported in the article * methodology: is the perspective broad enough and the article encompasses or evokes the multiple levels of which a fact is composed ? is it deep enough? Does it mention or include alternative viewpoints? Has an answer for those ? -- various indicators with a range from 0 to 5, ex. breadth of vision (1-5), etc. * social impact: may the article have any detrimental impact on week categories, like children, young people, old people, etc. ? (even citizens of other countries) Is the writer aware of the profound or not immediate implications of the directions possibly contained in the article ? Is the writer deliberately presenting a sketchy or restricted scenario ? Does the article produce some conditioning towards purposes not explicitly discussed in the article itself ? etc. ------------ -- qualità letteraria: è l'articolo caratterizzato da una buona qualità letteraria ? (non necessariamente inerente il genere giornalistico. Scala da 1 a 10 -- lessico utilizzato: fa l'articolo uso di un lessico violento o che potrebbe intimorire il lettore ? Fa un uso ingannevole del linguaggio, ad es. mediante affermazioni corrette sul piano tecnico, ma false o fuorvianti a una lettura convenzionale / superficiale ? -- l'articolo è stato scritto a pagamento o mediante un rapporto di collaborazione sovvenzionato e se sì da quali enti dipende ? -- etc. inserire qui tutte le possibili criticità, e inoltre i punti che possono essere mantenuti (come i riferimenti e se sono informazioni di prima mano) menzionate nei parametri del Trust project ------------ https://thetrustproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.29.20The-Trust-Indicators-Handout.pdf Un commento: -- "Best Practices" -- no, perché è autoreferenziale ! -- "Methods" -- sembra troppo generico, potete trovare più informazioni, una più dettagliata descrizione di tutti questi punti ? -- Actionable Feedback: yes, ma entro certi limiti -- Diverse Voices: why not -- Local: sure -- References: sure -- Labels: yes, to be better defined -- Journalist info: no